Thanks for sharing your perspective. It sounds like you hold a competing definition of ethics, and that's okay! Media being impartial is one value regarded by some as ethical. Media being impartial on the side of good is another ethical value that some people might hold. Ethics are grey, and it looks like we're simply different shades.

I will leave you with food for thought, though: in what ways are "impartial" media feeding consumers propaganda anyway? What determines whether an editorial decision qualifies as propaganda?